It's funny how men are only ever interested in women having freedom of choice (something they made sure we don't truly have) when it's about 'choosing' what benefits men. Not only with prostitution, but also surrogacy. They only ever support a woman when she is put in a situation where she either can choose between not to have bodily autonomy or starve. Men take this opportunity to sound moralistic and righteous, as they only time they're defending women's 'freedom of choice' is in times like this (who would choose to let a pig touch her, or even worse, to be an spectator, a lifeless puppet for nine months) while insulting the women who fight against it. A very usual move from them, showing their misogyny when they can choose a group of women who is already widely hated. Of course, they will use the beauty argument, that feminists are ugly and 'unfuckable'. As we all know, if a man defines you as such it's a death sentence — as if men aren't known for putting their things absolutely everywhere — regardless of your intelligence and actions, since you're not a human but an object, something to rent, in both situations of prostitution and surrogacy. In his mind, if one of the possible renters doesn't desire you, there must be something wrong with you.